<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Chevy Monte Carlo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.classicmontecarlos.com</link>
	<description>Chevy Monte Carlo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 22:21:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on 1970 Monte Carlo by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/first-generation/1970-monte-carlo/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 22:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/?p=83#comment-80</guid>
		<description>The 454 SS is definitely one of the sexiest classics.  Didn&#039;t know about the DeLorean link.  Nice job!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 454 SS is definitely one of the sexiest classics.  Didn&#8217;t know about the DeLorean link.  Nice job!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Second Generation Monte Carlo by Shyla M.</title>
		<link>http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/second-generation/second-generation-monte-carlo/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Shyla M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 17:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/?p=50#comment-79</guid>
		<description>These cars are beautiful. me and my brother was in a car accident and he was driving a 1973 (blue) monte carlo chervolete. the man in the other car hit my side and he died. a tool box came and hit him in the back of the head. i am lucky that i am alive and i thank God for that. 
I just wanted to thank you for showing these beautiful cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These cars are beautiful. me and my brother was in a car accident and he was driving a 1973 (blue) monte carlo chervolete. the man in the other car hit my side and he died. a tool box came and hit him in the back of the head. i am lucky that i am alive and i thank God for that.<br />
I just wanted to thank you for showing these beautiful cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1970 Monte Carlo by russ</title>
		<link>http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/first-generation/1970-monte-carlo/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/?p=83#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I have a 1970 monte with a 400 big block, factory four speed for sale . It looks just like the red one shown here. Very rare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a 1970 monte with a 400 big block, factory four speed for sale . It looks just like the red one shown here. Very rare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Third Generation Monte Carlo by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/third-generation/third-generation-monte-carlo/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/?p=62#comment-9</guid>
		<description>If it were me, I&#039;d probably get a first generation monte carlo if I was going to build a low rider but that&#039;s just personal preference.  I think the first generation would look better.  As far as performance, I don&#039;t think that would really matter but I&#039;m no expert in low riders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it were me, I&#8217;d probably get a first generation monte carlo if I was going to build a low rider but that&#8217;s just personal preference.  I think the first generation would look better.  As far as performance, I don&#8217;t think that would really matter but I&#8217;m no expert in low riders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Third Generation Monte Carlo by Junior</title>
		<link>http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/third-generation/third-generation-monte-carlo/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Junior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/?p=62#comment-8</guid>
		<description>so what the best to get for a lowrider?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so what the best to get for a lowrider?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1970 Monte Carlo by Mike H</title>
		<link>http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/first-generation/1970-monte-carlo/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/?p=83#comment-7</guid>
		<description>The 454 SS is definitely one of the sexiest classics.  Didn&#039;t know about the DeLorean link.  Nice job!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 454 SS is definitely one of the sexiest classics.  Didn&#8217;t know about the DeLorean link.  Nice job!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1972 Monte Carlo by John Franks</title>
		<link>http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/first-generation/1972-monte-carlo/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>John Franks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 06:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/?p=104#comment-5</guid>
		<description>these cars look pretty much stock other than those wild rims on the burnt orange one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these cars look pretty much stock other than those wild rims on the burnt orange one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1970 Monte Carlo by Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/first-generation/1970-monte-carlo/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/?p=83#comment-4</guid>
		<description>yeah, that&#039;s always been my dream car too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, that&#8217;s always been my dream car too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Fourth Generation Monte Carlo by jeff bolton</title>
		<link>http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/fourth-generation/fourth-generation-monte-carlo/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff bolton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/?p=73#comment-6</guid>
		<description>awesome site!  I&#039;ve never really liked the areocoupe, the original back window looks a lot better.

thanks for the great site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome site!  I&#8217;ve never really liked the areocoupe, the original back window looks a lot better.</p>
<p>thanks for the great site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1970 Monte Carlo by Mike Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/first-generation/1970-monte-carlo/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicmontecarlos.com/?p=83#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Wow!  great article, I&#039;ve always wanted a 1970 SS, my friend had one when we were in high school.

thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  great article, I&#8217;ve always wanted a 1970 SS, my friend had one when we were in high school.</p>
<p>thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
